‘Oak Desktop’ Requirements: User Survey


To help finalise the requirements for my final year project, I’ve thrown together a questionnaire about computer usage; more specifically, how and where you save documents, photographs and music on your computer.

Basically, the answers will help me prioritise which file formats to support, which (if any) existing applications to interface with and also help build a reliable means of auto tagging existing files.

So, if you’ve got some minutes spare, fill the survey in.

Also, for those wondering, Oak privately stands for Order And Chaos, referring to an application that should help bring order to files, by using freeform (chaotic) tagging to add metadata. Clever eh? As well as naming the application Oak Desktop, it also opens the way for a future product website to have an Oak Log. It’s all enough to make me feel rather too pleased with myself.

Thanks very much for your help.

The accompanying image is cropped from Autumn Yellow by gotigersjf (Creative Commons).

Tagged

Posted in

6 Responses to “‘Oak Desktop’ Requirements: User Survey”

  1. Comment by http://www.six-by-nine.org/ Andrea

    November 9th, 2005 at 1:14 pm 2005-11-09UTC13:14:25+0000

    I like how the accompanying picture is so totally not an oak. Very meta. A symbol for the randomness aspect, if you will. Bit of a puzzle, sort of thing.

    ... or not. I’ll just go fill out the survey.

    (Oak log! Hee!)

  2. Comment by http://ben-ward.co.uk Ben

    November 9th, 2005 at 1:52 pm 2005-11-09UTC13:52:53+0000

    Hmm, it’s Flickr tags claim it is, I’ll admit I wasn’t thinking much about it. It’s pretty anyway, even if I don’t really know if it’s an Oak or not. Hmm.

    I’ve got some nice ideas for real logo graphics and the like for the project, but they won’t get started on until around Christmas time, so random tree pictures from Flickr’s Creative Commons section are going to suffice until then.

  3. Comment by http://www.six-by-nine.org/ Andrea

    November 9th, 2005 at 3:31 pm 2005-11-09UTC15:31:52+0000

    I’m rather positive it’s a maple leaf. If you turn the picture upside down, you can sort of see the Canadian flag in there. I don’t know much about foliage, but both oaks and maple trees have very distinctively shaped leaves—you can see a nice example of the former here.

    (And yes, this is not really important, but you started with the tree puns.)

  4. Comment by http://ben-ward.co.uk Ben

    November 9th, 2005 at 4:26 pm 2005-11-09UTC16:26:41+0000

    I did indeed.

    OK then, well, errrr How about Maple Desk, where the tree is your computer and the software is extracting the pure, sweet syrupy files from the trunk? Wait, come back

    And now the idea of sweet, syrupy files is making me hungry. Great.

  5. Comment by http://www.six-by-nine.org/ Andrea

    November 9th, 2005 at 6:18 pm 2005-11-09UTC18:18:12+0000

    Aw no, I like the oak idea. The search results could have little acorn-shaped bullet points before them. And, like, tag clouds in the shape of a treetop! And stuff!

    ... okay, I just had visions of a squirrel mascot bouncing around. I’ll stop now.

  6. Comment by http://ben-ward.co.uk Ben

    November 9th, 2005 at 6:26 pm 2005-11-09UTC18:26:36+0000

    Don’t worry, Oak is staying. The trouble is that with it being a phonetic name, trying to be cool and Minty by giving all the system components metaphorical names isn’t really fitting. I quite like referring to system core as the Trunk and plug-ins as Leaves (that will probably stick), whilst it doesn’t really hold up under scrutiny, it’s just nice.

    If I were being literal about the plug-ins metaphor then perhaps Bird Boxes would be more appropriate

    In conclusion, names are silly but fun and they relieve tension whilst writing interim reports.